User talk:Thomas Wright Sulcer: Difference between revisions
imported>Thomas Wright Sulcer |
imported>Richard Nevell (→Latin (language): new section) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
:What's this Wiki-converting project?--[[User:Thomas Wright Sulcer|Thomas Wright Sulcer]] 16:14, 9 October 2010 (UTC) | :What's this Wiki-converting project?--[[User:Thomas Wright Sulcer|Thomas Wright Sulcer]] 16:14, 9 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
==[[Latin (language)]]== | |||
Hi Thomas, while looking over the articles in [[Category:Classics Workgroup]] I noticed that there were two articles which had overlapping scopes: [[Latin language]] and [[Latin (language)]]. The latter one was started by yourself and I thought you should know that I've redirected it to the other article. I copied over one of the paragraphs, while the material on which languages descend from Latin was already present. [[User:Richard Nevell|Richard Nevell]] 14:23, 29 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:23, 29 December 2012
Archives
New stuff
Trimmed.--Thomas Wright Sulcer 21:05, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Your two new articles
Hi, Thomas -- have you looked at the talk pages of http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ_Talk:Experiences_at_Citizendium and http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ:Areas_for_reform? Please do. Thanks! Hayford Peirce 21:49, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Probably will leave Citizendium
90% chance. See above. If people need to reach me, email me at [email protected]. --Thomas Wright Sulcer 23:16, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thanks for edits on NoSQL
Thomas, Hi! I noticed your work on NoSQL and appreciate it very much. I do hope you don't leave the project. It's a wiki, people are bound to disagree sometimes; it will work out (or so I hope).Pat Palmer 20:51, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Citizendium suffers from a lack of an arbitration process
When so-called "constables" continue to take sides in editorial disputes, it undermines the entire community. My comments on the talk page of Four color theorem were deleted by constables siding with a contributor who continues to criticize my work as "average", ridden with "minor errors", of only "magazine quality". What's needed is a fair arbitration process. Until then, I'm not contributing here any more.--Thomas Wright Sulcer 03:54, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- For a reply see here. --Peter Schmitt 08:58, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
re wiki-converting project
Thomas, are you administering the wiki-converting project, and if so, are you receiving submissions? —Anthony.Sebastian 15:39, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- What's this Wiki-converting project?--Thomas Wright Sulcer 16:14, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Latin (language)
Hi Thomas, while looking over the articles in I noticed that there were two articles which had overlapping scopes: Latin language and Latin (language). The latter one was started by yourself and I thought you should know that I've redirected it to the other article. I copied over one of the paragraphs, while the material on which languages descend from Latin was already present. Richard Nevell 14:23, 29 December 2012 (UTC)