User talk:Thomas Wright Sulcer: Difference between revisions
imported>Thomas Wright Sulcer (→Probably will leave Citizendium: copyedit) |
imported>John Stephenson (→'Experiences at Citizendium': new section) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Archives== | ==Archives== | ||
* [[User talk:Thomas Wright Sulcer/Archive 1|Archive 1]] | * [[User talk:Thomas Wright Sulcer/Archive 1|Archive 1]] | ||
| Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
==Probably will leave Citizendium== | ==Probably will leave Citizendium== | ||
90% chance. See above. If people need to reach me, email me at [email protected]. --[[User:Thomas Wright Sulcer|Thomas Wright Sulcer]] 23:16, 28 April 2010 (UTC) | 90% chance. See above. If people need to reach me, email me at [email protected]. --[[User:Thomas Wright Sulcer|Thomas Wright Sulcer]] 23:16, 28 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
== thanks for edits on NoSQL == | |||
Thomas, Hi! I noticed your work on [[NoSQL]] and appreciate it very much. I do hope you don't leave the project. It's a wiki, people are bound to disagree sometimes; it will work out (or so I hope).[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 20:51, 16 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
==Citizendium suffers from a lack of an arbitration process== | |||
When so-called "constables" continue to take sides in editorial disputes, it undermines the entire community. My comments on the talk page of [[Four color theorem]] were deleted by constables siding with a contributor who continues to criticize my work as "average", ridden with "minor errors", of only "magazine quality". What's needed is a fair arbitration process. Until then, I'm not contributing here any more.--[[User:Thomas Wright Sulcer|Thomas Wright Sulcer]] 03:54, 4 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
: For a reply see [[User talk:D. Matt Innis#stuff at the four-colour page|here]]. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 08:58, 4 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
== re wiki-converting project == | |||
Thomas, are you administering the wiki-converting project, and if so, are you receiving submissions? —[[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 15:39, 8 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
:What's this Wiki-converting project?--[[User:Thomas Wright Sulcer|Thomas Wright Sulcer]] 16:14, 9 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
==[[Latin (language)]]== | |||
Hi Thomas, while looking over the articles in [[Category:Classics Workgroup]] I noticed that there were two articles which had overlapping scopes: [[Latin language]] and [[Latin (language)]]. The latter one was started by yourself and I thought you should know that I've redirected it to the other article. I copied over one of the paragraphs, while the material on which languages descend from Latin was already present. [[User:Richard Nevell|Richard Nevell]] 14:23, 29 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
== 'Experiences at Citizendium' == | |||
I have restored this deleted page and moved it to your [[User:Thomas Wright Sulcer/Experiences at Citizendium|user space]], which is generally where this sort of statement goes. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] ([[User talk:John Stephenson|talk]]) 13:26, 8 March 2021 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:26, 8 March 2021
Archives
New stuff
Trimmed.--Thomas Wright Sulcer 21:05, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Your two new articles
Hi, Thomas -- have you looked at the talk pages of http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ_Talk:Experiences_at_Citizendium and http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ:Areas_for_reform? Please do. Thanks! Hayford Peirce 21:49, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Probably will leave Citizendium
90% chance. See above. If people need to reach me, email me at [email protected]. --Thomas Wright Sulcer 23:16, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thanks for edits on NoSQL
Thomas, Hi! I noticed your work on NoSQL and appreciate it very much. I do hope you don't leave the project. It's a wiki, people are bound to disagree sometimes; it will work out (or so I hope).Pat Palmer 20:51, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Citizendium suffers from a lack of an arbitration process
When so-called "constables" continue to take sides in editorial disputes, it undermines the entire community. My comments on the talk page of Four color theorem were deleted by constables siding with a contributor who continues to criticize my work as "average", ridden with "minor errors", of only "magazine quality". What's needed is a fair arbitration process. Until then, I'm not contributing here any more.--Thomas Wright Sulcer 03:54, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- For a reply see here. --Peter Schmitt 08:58, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
re wiki-converting project
Thomas, are you administering the wiki-converting project, and if so, are you receiving submissions? —Anthony.Sebastian 15:39, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- What's this Wiki-converting project?--Thomas Wright Sulcer 16:14, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Latin (language)
Hi Thomas, while looking over the articles in I noticed that there were two articles which had overlapping scopes: Latin language and Latin (language). The latter one was started by yourself and I thought you should know that I've redirected it to the other article. I copied over one of the paragraphs, while the material on which languages descend from Latin was already present. Richard Nevell 14:23, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
'Experiences at Citizendium'
I have restored this deleted page and moved it to your user space, which is generally where this sort of statement goes. John Stephenson (talk) 13:26, 8 March 2021 (UTC)